Meeting documents
- Meeting of Chiltern, South Bucks & Wycombe Joint Waste Collection Committee, Thursday, 26th June, 2014 10.30 am (Item 6.)
- View the reasons why item 6. is restricted
Paragraph 3 - Information relating to the financial or business affairs of any particular person (including the authority holding that information)
Minutes:
Paragraph 3 - Information relating to the financial or business
affairs of any particular person (including the authority holding that
information).
Members considered the report which provided an update on
the Programme Report and Risk Register and the following key points were made:
Health and Safety
Members noted there had been a concern over the Bank Holiday
catch-up when garden waste could not be tipped. There was a safety issue in
that if it was left in the collection vehicle there was the potential for it to
overheat and combust. After a short discussion it was agreed that the Chairman
would write to Bucks County Councillor Lesley Clarke for commitment on opening
times of the depot.Â
Following a visit to Agrivert it
was questioned why Agrivert could not continue to be
used due to the good job they are doing.Â
It was noted that Agrivert had been working on
an interim basis and that a long-term tender was being sought although it was
not certain when this would be concluded.
Contract Update
This was discussed later in the meeting.
Depots and Facilities
Clay Lane
Members were advised that Serco continued to raise concerns
about the management and infrastructure of the depot and a site visit by
Members took place on 24 June 2014. It
was noted there was a range of work required to bring the site up to standard
and that a programme of works was being prepared by the WDC Estates Team.Â
London Road
Members noted most work had now been completed and the site
was subject to a Members’ site visit on 24 June 2014.
BCC Interface
Members noted the report.
Service Delivery
It was reported that missed collections could be seen in
Appendix 1 of the report and that only 3 weeks were above the internal target
of 400Â Approximately 325,000 containers
were collected a week and some reported missed data was:
- Highest week - w/c 12/5/14
- 471 reported miss containers of 0.15% reported error rate. This was the week following bank
holiday.
- Lowest week - w/c 5/5/14 -
268 reported miss containers or 0.08% reported errors rate. This was bank
holiday week.
- w/c
9/6/14 - 361 reported miss containers or 0.11% reported error rate.
Collect and returns remain at a higher reported error
rate. Missed collections out of
approximately 8,850 had been:
·
Highest week - w/c 12/5/14 - 84 reported miss
containers or 0.9% reported error rate.Â
This was the week following bank holiday.
·
Lowest week - w/c 26/5/14 - 45 reported miss
containers or 0.5% reported error rate.Â
This was bank holiday week.
·
w/c 9/6/14 - 46
reported miss containers or 0.5% report error rate.
Members noted the tracker survey results for the last six
months in Appendix 2 which showed a positive trend in satisfaction rates. Overall satisfaction in Chiltern had
increased by 3.2 percentage points to 87.9% while overall the satisfaction in
Wycombe had increased by 4.3 percentage points to 89.8%.
Phase Three - New Service
Members noted that this phase would involve rolling out new
recycling schemes to communal collection areas, schools etc. with the aim to
collect the same range of materials as follows -
·
Stage 1 - Enhanced dry recycling
·
Stage 2 - Food waste if possible and garden
waste if requested
Members noted that the project was
currently delayed by about 4-6 weeks due to operational difficulties in the
bank holiday season.Â
Phase Four - Recycling Centres
It was reported that the bring sites / local recycling
centres were being reviewed to understand what level of sites would need to be
maintained following the introduction of enhanced kerbside collection of
recycling.Â
It was noted that Ashley Green Parish Council had been
contacted in relation to a trial for the removal of one site to test all
aspects of process which had been developed with Serco.Â
Communications
It was reported that
there had been no negative media coverage since the last Joint Waste Collection
Committee.Â
Members also noted that the
interim calendars had been circulated but that feedback had been minimal. It was agreed that a reminder be circulated
to hopefully capture further feedback.
Customer Service
Members noted details in Appendix 3.
Performance Figures
Members’ attention was brought to the performance table of
the joint waste service 2013/14 as laid out in the report. Tonnage and percentage figures were very
positive leading to a positive position to achieve targets in a full year
following roll out.
Key Operating Targets
(KOTs)
Members were handed a report and appendix on KOTs which
outlined the Councils’ draft proposals to Serco to change some elements of the
KOTs for year two of the joint waste service contract. Members were
pleased to see the removal of some of the targets that were more appropriately
monitored as part of the street cleansing zone standards. They also noted that
penalty levels had not been changed. Concern was raised in relation to
the timely collection of bins at recycling centres as residents’ perception was
negative should such bins be seen as full over a period of time. It was
agreed that this target would be also be monitored as part of the street
cleansing zone standards. Members also agreed that they wished to see KOT
relating to clearing of fly tipping, and failure to collect clinical waste not
be capable of being off-set, and thus in the “significant above target rangeâ€.
RESOLVED -
A.
The levels of
the KOTs are agreed for year 2 of the contract (2014/15)
B.
That the
targets for 2015/16 are reviewed in December 2014
C.
That the year
2 KOTs will run from April 2014 to March 2015
D.
KOTs will be
reported to the JWCC at each meeting but may run up to a month in behind
E.
Arrangements
are carried out to agree any necessary contract change with Serco
Risk Register
The Committee considered the Risk Register and the risk
levels were noted. Members raised concern
about the risk around whether the proposed waste transfer stations would go
ahead or not. Â
It was noted that Appendix 4, which was not appended to the
report, would be circulated shortly after the meeting.Â
RESOLVED - |
That the report be noted and that the Chairman write to County Councillor
Lesley Clarke in relation to a commitment on depot opening times. |